POPE LEO MUST INTERPRET VATICAN COUNCIL II RATIONALLY AND ETHICALLY BEFORE AN AUDIENCE WITH THE SSPX
24.01.2026Pope Leo interprets Vatican Council II irrationally and accepts the schismatic conclusion which the SSPX correctly rejects : Fr.Pagliarani Superior General wants an audience with the pope, without settling this issue.
NCR,SSPX ALIGNED WITH VCII RATIONAL
The National Catholic Reporter and the Society of St. Pius X are in the same doctrinal boat, when they choose the Rational Premise to interpret Vatican Council II, I wrote on 11.01.2026. They will be in unity and harmony with the ‘the strict interpretation’ of the dogma extra ecclesium nulla salus , the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX, all with no exceptions mentioned in Vatican Council II. No liberal - traditionalist division will exist any more.
The National Catholic Reporter correspondents and the SSPX and sedevacantist bishops, Sanborn, Pivarunas and others,will have the same interpretation and understanding of Vatican Council II. They will return to the old theology.
POPE LEO A RAD TRAD WITH VCII RATIONAL
When Pope Leo interprets Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise he is a rad trad on extra ecclesiam nulla salus too.
Check it out for yourself. If sedevacantist Bishop Sanborn and Pivarunas interpret Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise they affirm EENS with no exceptions. This is would be true for any one. It would be true for Pope Leo and Fr. Davide Pagliarani, the Superior General of the Society of St. Pius X. It would be true for Fr. John Berg, the Superior General of the FSSP, who recently met Pope Leo.
The division came into the Church with liberalism and liberalism was produced with the False Premise and Inference. It created an EENS with exceptions.
So there should not be a condition that only if the SSPX accepts Vatican Council II irrationally and the accompanying reforms over the last 60-plus years, only then they can meet the pope.
Michael Sean Winters at the NCR may not like this but when he interprets Vatican Council II rationally there is only one conclusion. It is common for all.
The Council is traditional, with the Rational Premise, Rational Inference and orthodox conclusion
There can no more be a New Ecumenism, New Ecclesiology, New Evangelization and New Canon Law etc. We are restricted by Vatican Council II. The Council limits us to the old theology and ecclesiology.
So before a meeting with the pope, Fr.Davide Pagliarani must ask how can we have a pope who interprets Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church irrationally? There is no other option for him but the rational one.
Pope Leo must dialogue with Fr. Pagliarani and the sedevacantist bishops Sanborn and Pivarunas and offer to interpret Vatican Council II rationally with an ecclesiocentric conclusion.
The SSPX interprets Vatican Council II irrationally like the pope but does not accept the non traditional conclusion. They reject the schismatic conclusion. We now know that Tradition is in harmony with Vatican Council II, rational.
LEFEBVRE NOT TOLD ABOUT LG 16 ERROR
Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre was not told that the Council could have been interpreted without the Rahnerian LG 16-mistake. Instead they excommunicated him and the bishops of the Society of St. Pius X (SSPX).Even today, the SSPX is not told to accept Vatican Council II (VC2) rational i.e. without the Rahner mistake, found in his book The Christian of the Future.
FR.JOHN BERG NOT TOLD
Pope Leo kept all this a secret from Fr. John Berg, the Superior General of the FSSP (Priestly Fraternity of St. Peter), whom he met the other day. The original members of the FSSP had their religious formation with the SSPX.
A SECRET AT SUMMORUM PONTIFICUM
When Pope Benedict issued Summorum Pontificum, the SSPX was still not told that they could have full canonical recognition if they accepted Vatican Council II, rationally, without the Rahnerian factual mistake. Fr. Pagliarani must ask Pope Leo to clarify this point before a meeting.
Pope Leo gave a catechesis on Vatican Council II this month during the Consistory and did not announce that LG 16 referred to a theoretical case. It was only hypothetical.So with Ad Gentes 7 (all need faith and baptism for salvation), VC II is aligned with Tradition (EENS etc) and LG 16 is not an explicit exception in the present time. An invisible case cannot be an exception.
Also hypothetical cases of LG 8, 14, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, in Vatican Council II, are not exceptions for the exclusivist ecclesiology of the Roman Missal of the 16th century.VC 2 is ecclesiocentric and traditional.
The Council supports the SSPX and sedevacantists MHT, CMRI, MHFM and not cardinal Koch on the New Ecumenism, Cardinal Tagle on the New Evangelization and Cardinal Roche on the New Missal which does not say outside the Catholic Church there is no salvation. With the Rational Premise the Council would support the SSPX and not Pope Leo, until he chooses to interpret Vatican Council II rationally.
The SSPX must now ask why they ‘out’ are and the liberal cardinals and bishops ‘in’ when the Council is traditional without Rahnerian theology.
COUNCIL IS TRADITIONALIST
Over the last 60-plus years traditionalists have been excommunicated in the name of Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally.
Archbishop Lefebvre was not told that the Council was traditionalist. It was Rahner, Ratzinger, Balthazar, Kung, Lehmann, Lubac, Congar, Guardini and others who interpreted Vatican Council II irrationally and accepted the nontraditional conclusion, who were in schism and should have been excommunicated.
It is Cardinal Walter Kasper who should be excommunicated for not interpreting Vatican Council II .
REVIEW EXCOMMUNICATION OF LEFEBVRE
It is now clear. Fr. Karl Rahner made a mistake in the book The Christian of the Future (1967.Herder and Herder, New York). On pp.94 and 95 he projects being saved in invincible ignorance ( Lumen Gentiun 16) as being an explicit and known example of salvation outside the Catholic Church. He then infers that LG 16 is an objective exception for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS). So EENS has become obsolete for him (pp.82-85).
In this book made up of talks he gave in Germany in 1965 he criticizes the understanding of extra ecclesiam nulla salus ‘in a very exclusive and permissive way’… So for him there is a new understanding of mission- that of the anonymous Christian, since the dogma EENS has been made obsolete with alleged visible cases of Lumen Gentium 16.They had to be visible, since invisible people in 1965-1967 could not be objective examples of salvation outside the Catholic Church.
Pope Benedict maintained the lie in Karl Rahner’s book The Christian of the Future . He supported the New Theology based upon implicit cases of the baptism of desire being explicit exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) of the Council of Trent. Unknown cases of being saved in invincible ignorance (LG 16) were projected as known exceptions for Augustine and Aquinas on outside the Church there is no salvation. Pope Leo must be asked why must the SSPX interpret Vatican Council II with the Rahner LG 16 visible mistake.
RATZINGER WAS HERETICAL AND SCHISMATIC
Archbishop Lefebvre was excommunicated because he did not accept Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally. But also because Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, the Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican, did not tell him about Vatican Council II, rational, the Council interpreted with LG 8, 14, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc refers to only hypothetical cases. So Ad Gentes 7 which says all need faith and baptism for salvation; and which is placed in the Catechism of the Catholic Church under the title Outside the Church there is no salvation, is aligned with the dogma EENS of the Council of Florence 1442, while LG , 1,14, 16 etc are not objective exceptions
So today Vatican Council II would have a continuity with the dogma EENS, with no known exceptions, the Athanasius Creed with no exceptions, an ecumenism of return of the Syllabus with no known exceptions and no exceptions for the exclusivist ecclesiology of the Roman Missal of the Latin Mass.
Vatican Council II would be aligned with all the Catechisms and the Magisterium and missionaries of the 16the century on EENS.
This was not told to Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre.
Instead he was excommunicated.
Fr.Pagliarani must discuss this issue with Pope Leo.
NEW SSPX BISHOPS RATIONAL ON VCII?
Pope Benedict did not tell all this to Archbishop Lefebvre and the SSPX bishops before he excommunicated them for not accepting Vatican Council II irrational and ordaining bishops.
He also kept this information a secret during the SSPX-Vatican Doctrinal Talks and when he issued Summorum Pontificum.So if there are new SSPX bishops tomorrow will they interpret Vatican Council II rationally or irrationally?
- Lionel Andrades